The EPA's "Air Assessment" results are in, and frankly, the metropolitan areas which are at greatest risk of breathing carcinogenic air is nothing new to most of us, particularly those of us in this tribe. The Bush Administration didn't help matters by scaling back much of the progress that the EPA made in enforcing tougher air quality standards.

With that said, should potential health risks relating to poor air quality be segue-way-ed into the overarching, Global Warming/Climate Change debate?

Read more about the EPA's NATA (National-Scale Air Toxics Assessments) results here:
www.usatoday.com/news/nati...tudy_N.htm