oxymoron

topic posted Fri, January 25, 2008 - 12:43 AM by  jake
anyone else think the name of this tribe is an oxymoron?
posted by:
jake
Oregon
  • Re: oxymoron

    Fri, January 25, 2008 - 4:30 AM
    No, that never occurred to me. To live is to consume. We all make SOME impact just to meet our most basic needs for food, shelter, and clothing. That doesn't mean we're all unethical.

    Oh, maybe you mean the term "consumerism" is a particular kind of consumption, where everything is commodified and the Powers That Be want us to buy lots of it. Yes, I'd agree there is some tension between those terms because of the connotation of consumerISM.
  • Re: oxymoron

    Sat, January 26, 2008 - 7:10 PM
    That's amazing, I was thinking the same thing yesterday!
    I also think most of the people on this tribe are not the ones who need the lessons. We, in general, seem willing to explore alternatives.
    I can't say as much for much of America. No matter how much we talk about not buying bottled water, bringing our our bags, being aware of how our choices affect the world, I still see people at the grocery store buying a case of water, getting their two items bagged in plastic, buying all of thier food in a box, and defending their "need" for Wal-Mart.
    I'm not saying our choices, as a small group, don't make a difference, I'm just struggling to spread the word. I'm either preaching to the choir or talking to a wall. It's like trying to explain hinduism to a devout catholic. They've taken a leap of faith and cannot see the other side.
    • Re: oxymoron

      Sat, January 26, 2008 - 7:58 PM
      Here in Santa Monica, polystyrene is banned as of Feb. 6th and plastic bags are going to be banned shortly thereafter. packaging for takeout will have to be made from biodegradable materials. LA is having more trouble passing these laws due to the grocery association lobby, but it may not be too far away. Imagine what could change if we start in the urban areas.
      • Re: oxymoron

        Sat, January 26, 2008 - 9:35 PM
        That is so great!
        A cafe I worked in had the corn plastic to-go containers, until the owner found out they used GMO corn. They switched to a #1 plastic (our town accepts 1&2 for recycling) and mostly paper. They also sell this great thing called a tiffin (it's an Indian version of tupperware), which you can bring back to get your food in. Too bad you can't walk in anyplace and hand them a box to put your food in, Health dept and what not.........
        • Re: oxymoron

          Sun, January 27, 2008 - 4:01 PM
          >>I'm either preaching to the choir or talking to a wall.

          Yes, I know the feeling!
          And yet, and yet, things DO seem to be changing. S-l-o-w-l-y, but changing. Like "green building". For the longest time developers wouldn't do it, said it's too expensive, too little ROI, and then in the past couple years it hit some sort of tipping point.
  • Re: oxymoron

    Sun, January 27, 2008 - 6:47 PM
    Edmund Burke said something about the man who did nothing because he could only do a little. Sure, if you want to get into semantics, you could say ethical consummerism is oxymoronic . Or you could be optimistic and hopeful that more people will buy things that dont leave big fat holes in the earth.
    • Re: oxymoron

      Sun, January 27, 2008 - 8:16 PM
      .. and i say that less is what this culture needs. The first world consumes 32 times more resources than the developing world. -www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02...iamond.html

      "The population especially of the developing world is growing, and some people remain fixated on this. They note that populations of countries like Kenya are growing rapidly, and they say that’s a big problem. Yes, it is a problem for Kenya’s more than 30 million people, but it’s not a burden on the whole world, because Kenyans consume so little. A real problem for the world is that each of us 300 million Americans consumes as much as 32 Kenyans."

      To bring it back to the context of the the quote by Mr. Burke: A lot of ethical consumerism is based on offsetting ie, bringing you own bags to the grocery store, although one drives there. Recycling although they bought whatever is in the container. Being an environmentalist adn eating animal products (any processed food for that matter). Using biodiesel, while still operating a vehicle, ad nauseam. Is it pessimistic to say that while such practices are better than nothing and are well intended, they are still no solution to the crisis facing humanity, and only ease the conscience of people who still maintain the destructive status quo? Offsetting only slows the social and technological change needed to cope with the environmental crisis. i'd say defending and excusing these behaviors is the equivalent to doing nothing.

      I'm not saying don't get involved, but be strategic in your action. Let's be honest with ourselves about the privilege we have, and work for a different world.
      • Re: oxymoron

        Sun, January 27, 2008 - 9:06 PM
        So Jake, you have a solar computer made of wood?
        • Re: oxymoron

          Sun, January 27, 2008 - 10:52 PM
          i have a recycled computer i got from a place where if you volunteer a few hours, they give you a computer of recycled parts. and my power bill is paid on the green power program where the utility company imports renewable energy and invests in renewable energy projects. not that any of that is the solution, but i think Burke would like that i'm doing something,

          i'll quit pointing fingers, and get back to what i want, a debate about strategies for change. offsets: compromise or solution
      • Re: oxymoron

        Sun, January 27, 2008 - 9:17 PM
        We also have to be realistsic Jake. Going backward to a more primitive life ain't gonna happen unless there's a catastrophe and there's no other choice. I am conscious that it would be impossible in this society, to be totally green. I think a lot of people are. If I could get bulk foods and bring my own container, I would but that's no available here and I haven't the room or consumption level to support that choice. That's just one example.

        Things happen gradually, and the changes that are happening could be a great in the long run. The sweeping statemtns about people's hypocrisy are typical of extremists and ignore that there are responsible and sustainable ways to keep these practices in place, for the most part. To think quick, radical change like that is possible is to ignore history and human nature and it's awfully cynical.

        If everyone at least believed and made an effort, that alone would make a massive difference. Naysaying accomplishes what?
  • Re: oxymoron

    Tue, February 26, 2008 - 5:50 PM
    AHAHAHA
    YES!
    that's what brought me to the tribe, it reminded me of an article i read in an adbuster's magazine entitiled ''Conducting Campitalism In An Ethical Manner" as if the roots of capitalism are enthical
    • Re: oxymoron

      Tue, April 1, 2008 - 12:41 PM
      Presently I live in a very environmentally sensitive part of Florida and I am amazed at how difficult the powers that be make it on people down here to recycle. There are no public recycling bins, if you are a business you have to pay to have them pick up your recyclables and then they only do newspaper, no colored cardboard like cereal boxes etc., glass, cans and #1 plastic.

      The government here is all into can't build here, can't cut that but that is only until a fee or my favorite a "mandatory donation" is made is to no less that 3 or 4 different county or city agencies along with several state groups.

      Me thinks that this area talks out of both sides of their mouths. They really don't care about the water, trees, green space, air quality etc. all they are after is the almighty $.
  • Re: oxymoron

    Sun, April 6, 2008 - 1:51 AM
    I don't think so..

    I think
    The idea is that we have to be aware of global environmental problems like global warming and the state of the oceans..
    But the best way is to address these problems is locally..

    I grew up in a culture where people thought they had to travel to Africa to improve the world..A lot of people still think like that..Travel is very bad for the environment and it is based on the wrong philosophy that all problems can be solved over there..

    Many of the global environmental problems originate overconsumption in the West..
    The best to improve the world is probably trying to improve your direct surroundings and your own behaviour..

    In beginning of the nineties when i learned about global warming..
    I decided to never fly again, not buy a car and eat less meat..
    That is my way of contributing
    So i like the title of this tribe very much..I really feel represented by it..
    • Re: oxymoron

      Sun, April 6, 2008 - 2:11 AM
      OOps sorry ..

      I thought i was in this tribe..Good tip..

      Think Globally, Act Locally
      env-action.tribe.net/

      So to answer your statement..
      Your right
      Ethical consumerism sounds like an oxymoron but Think Globally, Act Locally does not..

      • Re: oxymoron

        Mon, April 7, 2008 - 8:36 AM
        Harmen...whatever tribe you think you are in...you made several valid points...and I agree with you that change needs to start where you live.

        I still own a car but am very conscious about not driving unless I absolutely have to. And I have already decided that when it dies, that's it...I won't own another one. In fact, I'm getting ready to change jobs, taking a major cut in pay so that I can start working where I live.
        I live on a sailboat and believe that it is the least damaging of any method of travel. Plus I truly believe that my lifestyle has made me so much more attuned to the damage we are doing to the earth.

        That's why I get so frustrated with where I am now not being more environmentally conscious especially since it's such an eco-sensitive area.
  • Re: oxymoron

    Sun, April 6, 2008 - 5:12 PM
    We are all consumers on some levels, even if we limit it as much as we can for ethical or other reasons. So I, for one, do not see any conflict with the phrase 'ethical consumerism'.
    • Re: oxymoron

      Sun, April 6, 2008 - 10:55 PM
      The problem is that the ism suffix has so many meanings..

      If consumerism describes the action of consuming there is no problem..

      But sometimes the word consumerism is also used to describe a belief system..

      "the more we consume, the better we feel"

      That belief system is often critisized for having a low ethical ranking..

      "The -ism suffix can be used to express the following concepts:

      * religion or belief system (e.g. Mormonism)
      * doctrine or philosophy (e.g. pacifism, olympism)
      * theory developed by an individual (e.g. Marxism)
      * political movement (e.g. feminism)
      * artistic movement (e.g. cubism)
      * action, process or practice (e.g. voyeurism)
      * characteristic, quality or origin (e.g. heroism)
      * state or condition (e.g. pauperism)
      * excess or disease (e.g. botulism)
      * prejudice or bias (e.g. racism)
      * characteristic speech patterns (e.g. Yogiism, Bushism)"

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-ism
      • Re: oxymoron

        Mon, April 7, 2008 - 4:47 PM
        I agree that the naysaying and negativity will not help us move forward. Every being on this planet consumes something. You cannot live without putting food and water from the earth through your body. However, the American ideal of 'we live to consume' is very deadly to the planet and is why we suck up vast amounts of resources. Have you seen Annie Leonards' Story of Stuff video? www.storyofstuff.com. She explains how we got to this whole mindset and ways we can get out of it.

        I am always looking for ways to reduce my footprint. Meat has become more and more seldom in my diet, I'm trying to pack my own bags to the store, recycle everything I can (and reusing ziplocs and plastic containers in the home until they are unusable), and I am looking into getting my own kitchen size EM bokashi composting unit. I tried home composting before in my apartment and did not have the right setup and ended up with a swarm of fruit flies over a grey mold layer in the composting unit.... Ick! Every little bit counts, I think. Every time we go to the store and buy bulk and reuse the bags and go to the farmer's market counts. If you've got 10 pcs of packaging for your produce each visit, that adds up pretty quickly. And, by avoiding the stuff that is heavily processed and manufactured we are cutting out a huge amount of industrial waste to get the stuff to us. That adds up even faster. One estimate published in 'Garbage Land' pegs that for each pound of stuff on store shelves there was 320 pounds of industrial waste behind it. Now, recycling and buying used and freecyling takes a whole new meaning! Also check out the list of zero waste companies I found.... www.grrn.org/zerowaste/a...nies_zw.html
        • Re: oxymoron

          Wed, April 9, 2008 - 5:07 AM
          oh, the zero waste listing was new to me!- thank you for posting that!

          years ago that would have been a list of 2 companies , maybe..- so its great progress that there are enough companies now to actually justify listing them! Lets support them and others will feel encouraged.

          as Annie Leonard points out, we support the system by buying the stuff,- so we can use the same mechanism to support the companies we want to encourage.

Recent topics in "Ethical Consumerism"